The Abilene Paradox is a group dynamics phenomenon where members collectively agree on a decision that no individual actually wants, failing to communicate true preferences due to assumptions about others' desires.
The Abilene Paradox plays out most visibly in management meetings where a proposal is floated, nobody objects, and the team collectively commits to a course of action that most members privately believe is wrong. The silence is not agreement it is each person's assumption that their colleagues are enthusiastic and that raising doubts would mark them as difficult or disloyal. Organizations with low psychological safety are most vulnerable: when employees fear that expressing disagreement will damage their standing, the conditions for the paradox are structurally embedded rather than situational. The most effective prevention is not encouraging debate for its own sake but explicitly making it safe to disagree — anonymous pre-meeting input, structured devil's advocate roles, and leaders who visibly reward challenge over consensus reduce Abilene Paradox risk significantly.
What the research says about employee engagement.
Other ways this term appears across industries and languages.
Common questions about employee engagement.