The total average cost an organization spends to fill one open position — including recruiter salaries, job advertising, agency fees, technology costs, and onboarding expenses, divided by total hires in a period.
Hiring efficiency is the ratio of quality hires produced to the total recruiting resources invested — time, budget, and recruiter capacity — and is distinct from hiring speed, which measures only one dimension of resource consumption. An organization that fills roles quickly but at high cost or with poor quality-of-hire outcomes is fast but not efficient. The most common efficiency killer is process redundancy: too many interview rounds, approval layers that add days without adding predictive value, and manual steps that could be automated each consume recruiter time without improving the quality of the hiring decision. Efficiency improvements are highest when process audits focus on steps that consume the most time relative to their contribution to decision quality.
What the research says about employee engagement.
Other ways this term appears across industries and languages.
Common questions about employee engagement.