An approach to designing and managing employee pay consistently across multiple countries — balancing local market norms, legal requirements, and currency differences while maintaining internal equity and organizational pay philosophy.
Pay equity analysis requires two distinct analytical steps that are often confused: the first is a raw gap analysis showing overall differences in pay by demographic group, and the second is a controlled gap analysis that statistically adjusts for legitimate pay factors like role, level, location, and experience — revealing whether gaps remain after these factors are accounted for. The controlled gap is the measure of actual pay inequity; the raw gap reflects both inequity and the effects of historical underrepresentation in higher-paying roles. Both matter, but they require different interventions: controlled gaps require compensation correction, while raw gaps require advancement and hiring equity programs. Organizations that analyze only the raw gap misdiagnose the problem and implement the wrong solutions.
What the research says about employee engagement.
Other ways this term appears across industries and languages.
Common questions about employee engagement.